All these are
products of a simple logic. That is, simple results produced from certain
simple assumptions. Perhaps too much oxygen does not hurt the lungs, or cause
it to explode. Perhaps there is a limit, and when that limit is surpassed, then
the human lungs tranform into a new form which is larger, more comprehensive
and with greater capabilities. This way, human lungs can perhaps transform into
something that is more developed than the normal human lungs. And that does not
necessarily require a physical proof, or that it has to take place like that
physically. What is required is to evaluate the idea and whether it can take
place ideally or not. Similarly, too much knowledge can force the human mind to
a certain extent; however, perhaps there is a limit too, and when that limit is
surpassed as well (perhaps, only some few can do that, who knows), that
person’s mind and brain capacity go beyond the normal human mind and brain
capacities.
So you would like to see more, but
seeing her more makes you feel worse. That’s a two sided situation. And both
feelings can exist in the same person at the same time. And this situation
continues both while seeing her, and while being away from her. When you’re
with her, you would want to look at her more. But as you look more, you would
feel greater pains in your heart and in your mind. Then you would want to stop;
you would want less. You would wish not looking at her, not seeing her. This
way, you would think, and you would hope that your feelings will weaken,
therefore your pain and suffering will lessen. But it wouldn’t work. You would
still feel the pain while you’re not seeing her, and then you would want to see
her, even for a second. It’s like being addicted to drug. You would say that
you will see her for a very short time, and that will be the last time, but
with that very short time, you would reverse the whole process back to the
beginning. Then you would want more again. There is no end in this. There is no
end to this vicious cycle. To end this, you would need to end all things and
bring the end; that is, death. That would be the only way out of the circle,
only way to salvation. That is the breaking up of your hopes and your relations
with the circle. And for you, the salvation lies outside the circle anymore.
Knowledge has
this two-sided situation as well. If you are really running behind knowledge,
behind reality or truth, that is to say, if you don’t have the answers ready at
hand, or if you didn’t take them for granted from certain units, such as
religion, tradition, custom, ideology, culture, etc., then the process of
acquiring knowledge would bring out such two-sided situation for you as well.
The process of acquiring knowledge
means the development of both chaos and the orderliness of one’s mind. If the
orderliness of the mind is not satisfactory, this pushes one to continue
acquiring more knowledge. This way, the person thinks that he/she will be able
to overcome two things: 1) That he/she will be able to overcome the chaos in
his/her mind and that he/she will be able to establish a new order in his/her
mind. 2) That he/she will be able to find the knowledge of the truth, or
reality. This way, the person thinks that he/she will reach to wholeness,
completeness, totality, or the knowledge of the whole. But on the other hand,
acquiring more knowledge does not remove the chaos, disorder from one’s mind.
That is, the state of disorder does not reach to a state of wholeness.
Just like it is
not possible to achieve peace of mind and orderliness of the mind via acquiring
the knowledge of the whole or becoming one with the whole, similarly it is not
possible to reach to what we call love, the feeling of love, and what it is,
etc. Both of these – love and knowledge – lead people to the same end, to the
same dilemmatic end. And in that way they are similar to each other.
In the final
analysis, where does this circle of “hunger for knowledge but not being able to
know” lead people?
1) Either the person admits his/her
epistemological helplessness and weakness, and accepts living life this way –
in a state of ignorance.
2) Or, the person breaks this circle
one day, and he/she knows one day. This way, he/she achieves peace of mind.
3) Or finally, the person tries another
way, other than breaking the circle by overcoming the dilemma of wanting to
know and not being able to know. In order to do this, he/she wants to go beyond
the unknowable. He/she approaches one of the unknowns that stands in front of
him/her. What he/she thinks is to confront death (the unknown) and go beyond
that. This way, he/she thinks that he/she will go beyond the unknown and
finally know things, see things and understand things. What he/she does at that
point is not simply taking his/her life. Instead, it is reaching to the state
of knowing. This way, he/she removes the curtain between the real and non-real,
and reaches to the knowledge of the reality.
0 comments:
Post a Comment